Democracy

 Brainstorming session

Personally, I am still using the label of libertarianism for me, this is just a brainstorming session

How about democracy + the democratic personnel management approach

Social libertarianism (with licensing and regulation)

Social democracy when it comes to the economy (so that mediocre people can have jobs with proper incomes too!)

Markets and budgets denominated in money for the allocation of goods and services, but with heavy government intervention

We always believe in the use of economics for decision making, but not for the sake of defining reality.

We love accounting and statistics, and believe very strongly in their use. They are very important when it comes to administration.

We believe in making people smarter, wiser and more competent. Rather than dumber and dumber for the sake of ease of governance.

State schooling: Elected school boards consisting of parents can sack staff members with notice, but without cause.

Socialised medicine: but you can blacklist medical staff within the responsibility of the (elected) district health board.

Full liberty and libertarianism in defaming others. Name suppression laws gone.

Total libertarianism in patents and copyright. Intellectual property isn't property. This is THE MOST important libertarian issue. Followed closely by the repeal of defamation laws. Forget satellites and cell towers for now.

Repeal all patent laws and copyright laws.

Ban university staff (from professors to lecturers to tutors to janitors to administrators) from being swinging/polyamory license holders.

Push swingers out of directorship positions, banking roles, the judiciary, political parties and out of parliament. Note: nz has different styles of governance to some other places.

Have votes to declare people "dumb and annoying", and repeated votes to temporarily banish them (democratic time out).

Use applications like integron to figure out the wheat from the chaff in personal character and integrity.

Have citizens initiated referendums to purge the judiciary and temporarily blacklist all judges and judicial staff. Ditto for crown law. Separate things though. They blacklist for five years.

**

And I repeat perhaps also social libertarianism with regulation, licensing and registration?

And how about keeping the welfare state alive (healthcare, education, unemployment relief, superannuation, sickness welfare, disability support, social housing for down-and-outs, and certain types of poor or invalided people).

And how about collective ownership of some of the means of production, such as power generation and lines companies? And also telecommunications. But not all of the means of production.

How about just good policy on debt and debt relief for farmers? 

But on the other hand, let us not do collective agriculture and farming. It sucks.

Personnel is policy

More ideas:

This next bit actually isn’t all that well put together. It is just ideas.

Categorise:

Democratically Label Chinese people as Orientals

Orientals:

And tell them that they're banned from accumulation of excessive wealth

Banned from spending money on luxuries

Banned from wearing colours other than beige, brown, cream, white, black and grey.

Banned from using makeup.

Banned from wearing toupes.

Banned from using hair dye.

Required to achieve certain standards of speaking and writing in French, German and English. Or face punitive taxation.

Banned from luxury cars, owning luxury holiday homes.

Banned from the sex industry. Entirely.

Banned from renting out more than two houses or buildings as landlords.

Banned entirely from the language school industry.

Banned from hiring non unionised workers in agricultural operations.

Banned from hiring non citizens as workers in agricultural operations.

Banned from spending more than $60 per week on eating out.

Required to give 10% of the income to charity.

They can opt out of being an oriental by repudiating and disavowing Confucius in public.

They must say out loud:

There is no such thing as a "superior man", and the Confucian gentleman is a retard and a dunderhead. And say it 100 times over.

Taking a vow of financial modesty. Refusing to own more than 2 houses; or more than one house and one place of business; or more than 5 hectares of land.

Or if you register as an agricultural small business owner there are different rules.

They just promise to dress modestly at all times, and can only wear light brown, grey or black.

They must promise not to meditate, and instead to read 30-40 books a year, to turn their minds "English".

They must state out loud that Buddhist meditation makes you vapid. And say it 500 times over.

They must burn a picture of Mao, Stalin, Lenin and Marx.

And maybe a few other things.

This has been bombastic on purpose.

***

Or if they just become a Christian, Jew or Muslim, and agree not to accumulate too much wealth, and learn English, French and German, then they can de register as an oriental. Their religious leader can tell them if they have accumulated too much wealth, as can a bureaucrat.

****

Their biggest faults

Love of money

Love of banquets and food

Love of visual finery

Extreme moral cowardice + Lack of integrity

Extreme physical cowardice, dereliction of duty

Willing to damage other people for ease of governance, and to promote harmony. Instead of encouraging standards.

****
****

Next I think that we should start talking seriously about “the abolition of motherhood” and the abolition of mothers. Even if only as a thought experiment.

Perhaps we abolish the concept of motherhood.

Starting with wombs for hire, for use in conjunction with IVF.

Start charities that help men to afford IVF and the rental of the womb. Big charities with lots of money.

Legalise and regulate concubinage contracts.

Make all children the sole property of the father in cases of normal pregnancy and birth (man’s name only on the birth certificate)

Children are to be seen as a gift from the woman to the man, as a token of her gratitude for giving her shelter in his life and in his home. And also as a token of gratitude to mankind as a whole for giving her shelter and creating an liveable world. After all, the brotherhood of man builds houses, roads, bridges and power stations. They do plumbing and electrical work and computers and stuff. And make the world possible.

In a society based on altruism, we defend the widow and the orphan. We fight to make the world hospitable for women and children. But in a world where too many people are fighting for status and independence instead of fighting to do good. And where individualism is the norm (which I don’t think should be changed. Individualism isn’t a bad thing, and probably goes along with education). I don’t think that the old way is as easy. That paragraph is obscure on purpose.

It is so hard. I want to be kind, compassionate, “altruistic”. But it is so hard. The world isn’t geared up that way. Some might say that.